Hello! Community Page
- www.webomatica.com/wordpress/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Great to see another person greeting Chrome OS with skepticism, and I think you raise some really valid points that help poke more holes in Michael Arrington's fanboy rant on Chrome OS. His...
- Yes, I was interested in a netbook earlier this year, but still haven't purchased one. After looking at different models and even fiddling around with Linux in VM Ware fusion to see what it...
- I'm surprised that you aren't into this announcement, considering how often you've expressed being on the fence about getting a netbook. Chrome OS appears to me to be the ultimate...
- When I was at college, we had one of these in the student center. It was pretty good, since the internet connection wasn't good enough for streaming anything, and few people had cars (so trips...
- Nice Article Brother. should've added Pages to the mix, thought WTF I'll never turn on Word but its what I did. Pages is an Awesome WP App
Webomatica
Entertainment and Tech Digest
A general and a professor are teaching a speed learning course via the television where citizens of The Village can learn three years worth of knowledge in three minutes. Number 6 realizes this speed learning could be a dangerous form of brainwashing.
Number 6 decides to learn the identity of the general. He finds an administrator (Number 12) who ... Continue reading »
Number 6 decides to learn the identity of the general. He finds an administrator (Number 12) who ... Continue reading »
6 months ago
I think Rodenberry was commenting on the behaviour of certain American officials who, in finding other people not living by the 'democratic ideals' espoused in the US Constitution (as interpreted by their own vision) - act to force conformity WITH their own vision regardless of the original vision of America's 'founding fathers'. Hence, those who are rich can practice 'freedom of speech and expression' through providing valuable 'gifts' and money to those in positions of authority (thus influencing their decisions) whilst some NOT having such wealth cannot even genuinely 'speak' or 'express' themselves in public forums without fear of retribution [ie: peacefully assembled war protesters (armed only with signs) stormed by weapon wielding police whom the authorities order to quash the public exercise of ''free speech and expression' (both in the 1960s & the early 2000s)
Both series criticized the preference for control and order, over the populace, by the very few as opposed to the rights of the individual.
Thanks for posting so much regarding #6. Only wish they'd televise it again in the USA. It might've been banned during the Bush years because (like so many detective shows) it provoked thought over mindless observation.