<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:24:26 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-4125124</link><description>Automotive manufacturers and suppliers are among tesa’s most important industrial customers internationally. tesa offers professional solutions for protection during transportation, protection of delicate surfaces,permanent fixing and noise insulation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">adhestape</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:24:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-2519000</link><description>Wow that's some crazy watching.  Good luck</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Star Envelope King</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:06:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-1754344</link><description>I spent the first couple years of my marriage acquainting my wife with DS9 (which she didn't care for) and Voyager (which she liked). I was actually surprise by how much I like Voyager the second time around. There really is some good storytelling there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I haven't seen all of Enterprise, though the 4th season really picked up with the "mini-arc" format and much better story concepts. Too bad they didn't get the chance to experiment with that for another season or two. The final episode, though, is complete and utter not-even-a-pretense-at-effort garbage.  Worse even than The Outrageous Okona.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tunequest</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:21:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-1754348</link><description>dude don't do it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sang</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:07:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-1754347</link><description>This is definitely the completist part of me, musing on how much storage space it would take to amass all this stuff, let alone watch it all. I actually haven't watched any of the series completely, past the Original Series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a general critique of Star Trek - each series past TOS had at least one character that bugged me, hence keeping me from enjoying each series to its fullest. In Next Gen it was Wesley, Deep Space Nine either Odo or those annoying Ferengi, Voyager it was Neelix, and Enterprise - well the captain, and TPol (what the heck was up with that decontamination gel). The Xindi space thing was the last straw.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If I ever do watch all this stuff I'll likely go in chronological order, meaning I'll start with Next Generation. I guess I can add watching every star trek episode ever made to my list of things to do before I die :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:48:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-1754346</link><description>What, no love for "Star Trek the Animated Series"?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That would add 22 episodes...roughly 11 more hours of programming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But seriously, the amount of Star Trek programming boggles the mind. The combined episode count pretty much warrants all that convention craziness...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:40:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Star Trek: Back Of The Envelope Calculation</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/02/09/star-trek-back-of-the-envelope-calculation/#comment-1754345</link><description>I really loved Trek, but it's 'Spaceballs' compared to BSG. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The signal to noise ratio of interesting thought provoking Trek content vs 'Neelix gets trapped in the holodeck with Luxanna Troi and Reg Barclay' - type situations was just too high.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(I do realize there was no such episode, and that Neelix never even made it to a-Quad)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Trek was good in the early 90's, but that would be a horrible waste of time watching all those old episodes (especially those pre-7/9 Voyager episodes!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Really looking forward to the movie though. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeff</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 19:34:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>