<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Second Life Has No Life?</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:44:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Second Life Has No Life?</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/03/second-life-has-no-life/#comment-1749323</link><description>Second Life is good for people who have nothing to do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:44:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Second Life Has No Life?</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/03/second-life-has-no-life/#comment-1749322</link><description>Have a look at our story from 29-Dec-2006 about Second Life user numbers and a comparison with other Online Games at &lt;a href="http://www.duvet-dayz.com/archives/2006/12/29/251/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.duvet-dayz.com/archives/2006/12/29/251/&lt;/a&gt; .&lt;br&gt;The story shows that SL is just 3% of WoW and about 1% of the most successful multiplayer game. Link and charts included.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We compared it to a town stretched out over the whole world. With a population densitiy as high as a national park in Canada no wonder you never meet anybody.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">duvet-dayz.com</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:55:58 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>