<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Rumor: Yahoo! Merging With AOL?</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:51:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Rumor: Yahoo! Merging With AOL?</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/04/09/rumor-yahoo-merging-with-aol/#comment-323310</link><description>I hate it when huge corporations merge.  Pretty soon the world will just be 1 big corporation.  And it will probably be ran by George W!   LOL</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">unTECHy</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:51:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumor: Yahoo! Merging With AOL?</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/04/09/rumor-yahoo-merging-with-aol/#comment-320965</link><description>That MySpace wrinkle is a really interesting one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm also amused by the fact that Google bought a stake in AOL (a year ago?) and MSFT has that stake in Facebook. Everyone has their fingers in so many pies....it makes for some interesting combinations/alliances as you mix and match the various pieces in the puzzle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:28:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumor: Yahoo! Merging With AOL?</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/04/09/rumor-yahoo-merging-with-aol/#comment-320079</link><description>Good points. I think that long-term / short-term issue for shareholders is a huge one. If you think Yahoo! management is competent enough to manage a merger with AOL, vs. their mismanagement is part of the problem, and they deserve to be bought / replaced.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now there's this added wrinkle of News corp "changing sides" and siding with Microsoft - meaning if Yahoo! goes Microsoft they could get access to MySpace.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder which will wrap up sooner - YHOO / MSFT or Hilary / Obama?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really hope YHOOs earnings (real soon now) provide an impetus for action one way or another. It could be that this AOL merger business is just a negotiating tactic to get MSFT to raise their bid. And earnings will be the proof of Yahoo!s worth at this point in time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:59:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Rumor: Yahoo! Merging With AOL?</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/04/09/rumor-yahoo-merging-with-aol/#comment-319387</link><description>Interesting. I'm not too bullish on an AOL/Yahoo merger, but I suppose it has *some* merit.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* It would solidify Yahoo's ambitions on the middle-America crowd (both Yahoo and AOL have been abandoned - to some extent - by the technorati/bleeding edge), but there is still a big pack of mainstream users that are using these services and still valuable to advertisers&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* The 2 companies have been pursuing in-house content strategies that *might* complement each other (think Yahoo's "Shine" and AOL's popular TMZ). Granted Google's been whipping both companies with a distinctly different strategy, but by going the content route, and avoiding the search/adsense competition, they could get out of the direct gunsights of "THE GOOGLE"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* It's not hotmail/yahoomail, but both have significant email and im audiences. There might be something nice there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;* I rarely go to &lt;a href="http://AOL.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;AOL.com&lt;/a&gt;, but I just did for kicks and I'll be damned if their homepage doesn't look almost identical to the Yahoo one! (see for yourself). That's synergy baby!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Anyway, I'm grasping at straws here. The big question is: if I'm a large shareholder, which future is sounding better to my wallet? If I'm patient, maybe the AOL/Yahoo deal is sounding good. But if I'm not, the certainty of the MSFT offer sounds damned good in the short-term...and one has to think that a MSFT/Yahoo combo still sounds more potent long-term than an AOL/Yahoo combo (despite anyone's misgivings about Ballmer and the "evil empire").</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papa</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:13:19 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>