Community Page
- www.webomatica.com/wordpress/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- The lack of makeup, drab hair, and fake teeth made Charlize Theron look bad in that film. She carried that extra 30 pounds quite well.
- Vandalizing a RedBox... maybe that's why they put 'em in grocery stores as opposed to bars...
- Yeah, when I was considering a netbook, linux always shows up on the cheaper model with a premium for XP. Would likely prefer the Chrome option to Linux, but to XP? Not sure on that one. Largely...
- Sure... we do what we can.
- Most people purchasing a netbook want Windows UI over a Linux one. Why? Probably comfort and the ability to run certain apps they already have. Google has an uphill battle here. Netbook...
Webomatica
Entertainment and Tech Digest
Here's a pretty good argument over at the Search Engine Journal about why the "nofollow" tag might not be all that.
The original idea for this tag was to reduce comment spam. Here's the take from Google, and the objective viewpoint at Wikipedia. ... Continue reading »
The original idea for this tag was to reduce comment spam. Here's the take from Google, and the objective viewpoint at Wikipedia. ... Continue reading »
2 years ago
2 years ago
2 years ago
The Wordpress guys were some of the early proponents of it 2 years ago, but Matt says now that it doesn't do anything: http://photomatt.net/2007/01/22/wikipedia-nofol...
2 years ago
Thanks for referencing me. :)
2 years ago
2 years ago
Nofollow doesn't matter much to me, I've removed my blog from most of the search engines. I find people searching Google or MSN for strange crap (I seriously see "fuck animals" as one of the top searches) and landing at my site, and it kind of just depresses me.
I'd rather have someone see my comment here, maybe find they are interested in my thoughts and opinions, and click on to my site. Does that sound crazy?
2 years ago
Well, one sure way to I could get more comments is to be more controversial, unfortunately that's not really in my nature.
I hear you about the strange search strings. I sometimes look at my logs but treat it more humorously. I get an annoying amount of Paris Hilton searches (whoops, there I go again).
Not crazy thinking. That's how I look at things when I comment on someone else's blog.
So thanks for commenting - I always find it inspiring that I have yet another semi-regular reader. It keeps me motivated!
2 years ago
Thanks for writing! I'm very glad to have found this place.
2 years ago
Very exact remark! The some spammetrs are very inventive, it is not a lot of them, therefore it is not terrible.
To webomatica: "...I guess it just means looking at each comment and the link in it, and probably even visiting said site..."
Manual checking of "said site" ?an do nothing. Usually such checks are done within a 7-10 days after the posting. Therefore clever spammers can apply technical methods of counteraction, for example to make temporary REDIRECT from his site to other GOOD site and You'll see it instead of spammer's own site.
I saw at least 3 such tricks on my forums :(
"NoFollow" don't work for a spam preventing. But "NoFollow" is a very good idea for using as described in dougal gunters blog.
2 years ago
I hate spam!
1 year ago
Wonder what happen if we all use nofollow on our websites? And how about DMOZ & Yahoo directory.