<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Movie Notes: Tomorrow Never Dies</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Technology and Entertainment Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:54:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Tomorrow Never Dies</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/01/movie-notes-tomorrow-never-dies/#comment-1749302</link><description>The villain’s role is that of an evil media magnate, and it would have been wise to have underplayed the role and presented a cold, businesslike protagonist; after all, there was a perfect real-life ‘evil tyrant’ role model in Rupert Murdoch. Instead, Jonathan Pryce hams it up and chews the scenery like he’s the Batman villain of the week (as my Bondsesh mate said; ‘a bit Willy Wonka, isn’t he?’). Michelle Yeoh is attractive enough and well versed in chop-socky moves, but is fed some terrible lines and can’t even carry those off convincingly. And Teri Hatcher? What were they thinking? On the plus side, Brosnan (a very good actor) is allowed some room in which to display emotions other than ‘Goldeneye’s one-size-fits-all steely determination. Unfortunately, no-one he interacts with except M, Moneypenny and Q are capable of returning dialogue with equal acting skills, so he ends up wanting for a worthy foil to bounce off. Moreover, there are frustratingly few such ‘quiet’ scenes amid some extremely overblown (but admittedly exciting) stunts; best was the ‘video game’ car chase. Brosnan was better than in ‘Goldeneye’, but yeah, the movie wasn’t quite as much fun.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Slammerworm</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 07:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>