<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Movie Notes: Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Technology and Entertainment Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:39:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/31/movie-notes-indiana-jones-and-the-last-crusade/#comment-564677</link><description>Yeah - it's pretty shocking how much better Crusade was when I rewatched it&lt;br&gt;after seeing Crystal Skull. It covers so much more ground - the opening&lt;br&gt;scene to Indy's childhood, Venice, Germany, the mideast, and the Grail is on&lt;br&gt;par with the ark in terms of a cool object to quest for. Then add in Indy's&lt;br&gt;dad and it's almost better than raiders in some ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think the super-old crusader is in retrospect, was definitely rather&lt;br&gt;silly, and possibly not much sillier than anything in Skull, thankfully he&lt;br&gt;didn't leave the cave, and showed up at the end after a lot of great stuff&lt;br&gt;had already passed. Wheras, Skull seemed to have silly things scattered&lt;br&gt;throughout the whole movie, starting with that refrigerator, although, even&lt;br&gt;that magnetized coffin was pretty silly, too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Movie Notes: Indiana Jones And The Last Crusade</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/05/31/movie-notes-indiana-jones-and-the-last-crusade/#comment-564585</link><description>Sean Connery was a great addition to this film. Not only did it add a wonderful father/son dynamic, but they also had a great old/young dynamic (didn't both of them want the same hot blonde Nazi chick at one point?). They tried to play up the father/son and old/young thing again in Crystal Skull, but somehow -- like other aspects of that film -- it fell short of its predecessor (Crusade) and ended up having the "been there, done that" syndrome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I find it interesting too that I wasn't offended by the idea of a super-old Crusader knight guarding the actual Grail. True, it sounds ridiculous, but I'm ok with slight flights of fancy in these films. In a way, I can understand where Lucas was trying to go with the alien plot of Indy 4. I really think there was a way to make the alien idea work. I imagine that's why the script went through so many iterations. But as you say, they definitely chose poorly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm glad Connery didn't reprise his role in Indy 4 either. Indy 3 was just about perfect.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papa</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 22:05:52 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>