<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:57:22 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2915988</link><description>Hmmm, thats kinda disappointing from Apple ,I would have expected alot more from them , they normally do not pull silly stunts like this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apple Ipod</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2748485</link><description>In my opinion i think Apple has a lack of good apps and only thinks about making funny/stupid apps which arent usefull at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I vote for categorized apps :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Iphone</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 05:37:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2527716</link><description>they need more apps that are easily accessible by everyone and more organized.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Apple Recalls USB For iPhone</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:52:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2453657</link><description>This is why we're still waiting for TomTom. Can't believe it!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iPhone</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:27:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2239466</link><description>Yep this is yet another example of apple creating a walled garden. I  &lt;br&gt;can see banning malicious apps but that's about it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 20:06:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2235037</link><description>I agree, they should allow any app to be listed. If people want to spend money on them, that's their own fault. Since they're starting to ban apps, it's a wonder if iPhone apps development will continue to flourish.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daferret</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:49:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2145997</link><description>A "just for fun" category is very a good idea, and a good compromise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:02:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone Apps: The Market Should Decide &amp;#8220;Limited Utility&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2008/09/04/iphone-apps-the-market-should-decide-limited-utility/#comment-2140125</link><description>I think Apple should just create some categories for these "low utility" apps. Maybe a "just for fun" category, or for items that might consist of racier fare, and "adult" or "mature" category. There's definitely ways to still provide the apps but shunt them off into a separate area of Apple is concerned about bizzaro content clogging up the more highly trafficked channels on the app store.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">papa</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 01:38:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>