DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Webomatica is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Webomatica

Entertainment and Tech Digest
Jump to original thread »
Author

Google Page Rank Updates, Penalities, and Spam War Escalation

Started by webomatica · 10 months ago

In addition to traffic, links coming in, and how many thousands of spam comments Akismet has blocked - another detail that some bloggers obsess over is Google PageRank - basically a number from 1 to 10 assigned to a web page based on number of links to it from other web pages - and the page rank ... Continue reading »

4 comments

  • Martin

    1 year ago

    A little correction: Pagerank is a number from 0-10 but can also be unassigned :)
    reply
  • Mike

    1 year ago

    Google is just trying to keep a good search engine. Their method of determining which sites that would be at the top was a good formula - chances are that if more people link to Apple.com with the word 'Apple', then people searching for 'Apple' probably want Apple.com.

    I'm glad that people who are trying to game the formula are being pushed farther down the results list, because I use Google all the time and would hate to see it wither (or become irrelevant) because people are cheating.

    Splogs are obviously trying to cheat, but things like PayPerPost trick good bloggers into doing something similar. Since it's not illegal under US law, Google can't have them shut down...and appealing to bloggers to stop using PayPerPost probably wouldn't do much good, either. So, Google just hurt people outright for using it.

    You should be at the top of the results list if you have the information people are searching for. If you're not providing that information, you don't deserve to be at the top of that list.

    I understand the motivation to be at the top of that list - people clicking ads on your site, when they visit - but I don't think that trumps the ability for people to find what they're looking for.

    Am I looking at this improperly?
    reply
  • Phil

    1 year ago

    Oh no! First comment is a splog trackback!

    Google is just protecting their best interests, having the most relevant search engine. It makes you wonder how they tell what a paid text link is and what a blogroll or other link is though.

    As for spam, I'm getting hit quite hard myself at the moment, but doing the behind the scenes work clears it up. I don't see the point in taking out nofollow though, having nofollow won't stop the spammers. If you're using the original dofollow plugin, you could consider swapping to one that removes nofollow after a number of days (so that any spamments that slip through don't get nofollow removed before you can remove them) or another one I heard of recently which removes nofollow after a commenter has made 3 comments or more, so that it rewards regular commenters.
    reply
  • webomatica

    1 year ago

    Yeah... I think the priority for Google is : relevant search results first. I agree with that.

    Phil - from what I gather on the comments on other sites - there is a human element involved now, as in Google employees looking at a suspect site for evidence of paid links.

    So yesterday, I made sure nofollow was on in the comments, and the most recent commentators sidebar. To balance this out, the links in my blogroll and the "top commentators" sidebar are clean. I think that's an okay balance.
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login