<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Google Needs Help Finding Paid Links</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Technology and Entertainment Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:16:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Needs Help Finding Paid Links</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/04/15/google-needs-help-finding-paid-links/#comment-1751252</link><description>The implication is that some sites are deliberately making things unclear, meaning they aren't disclosing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:16:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Needs Help Finding Paid Links</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/04/15/google-needs-help-finding-paid-links/#comment-1751254</link><description>It would be purely voluntary on the publisher's part, but a rel="sponsored" attribute similar to rel="nofollow" might do the trick.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That's something that could be picked up and factored by an algorithm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tunequest</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Needs Help Finding Paid Links</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/04/15/google-needs-help-finding-paid-links/#comment-1751253</link><description>It's obviously an attempt from Google to seperate sponsored links inside content from regular links. What I don't get is why Google is having such a hard time discovering them, especially since most programs and opportunities require full disclosure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lars-Christian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 17:12:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>