Community Page
- www.webomatica.com/wordpress/ Jump to website »
-
Subscribe -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
-
Recent Comments
- Great to see another person greeting Chrome OS with skepticism, and I think you raise some really valid points that help poke more holes in Michael Arrington's fanboy rant on Chrome OS. His...
- Yes, I was interested in a netbook earlier this year, but still haven't purchased one. After looking at different models and even fiddling around with Linux in VM Ware fusion to see what it...
- I'm surprised that you aren't into this announcement, considering how often you've expressed being on the fence about getting a netbook. Chrome OS appears to me to be the ultimate...
- When I was at college, we had one of these in the student center. It was pretty good, since the internet connection wasn't good enough for streaming anything, and few people had cars (so trips...
- Nice Article Brother. should've added Pages to the mix, thought WTF I'll never turn on Word but its what I did. Pages is an Awesome WP App
Webomatica
Entertainment and Tech Digest
The headline says it all, but I'm obviously on the side of full articles in blog feeds (usually RSS). I also appreciate other sites and blogs that do the same.
The full feed thing as I see it, is partly a PR move. ... Continue reading »
The full feed thing as I see it, is partly a PR move. ... Continue reading »
2 years ago
Webomatica had around 30 posts with a 'full article feed' and that was fine and easiy readable. Another site with 30 posts had only excerpts which meant I had to go through the sites navigation... that took a while.
Excerpts haven't bothered me until now and this is/was the first time I'd read feeds in 'feed mode' (just to save time), usually I click to go straight to the website.
I was considering posting a rant about this yesterday!
2 years ago
I agree on your points. More than this I have to say that I hate when the sites gives you only a breadcrumb of the information, because they want some more stats, more direct visits, more ads.
The key is that through the RSS is hard to pass the adverts, therefore it implies less earning.
From the other side, when I feel really interested in a post, I like to view it in its environment, the color of the site and the possibility to comment...
...pro and con, but definitely a point worth a though! Personally I put the entire content on RSS, just because I think that the reader of my blog would appreciate to read what I write wherever they like!
Cheers
PS: of course the loss of earning from Google Ads, in my case, should not be taken seriously :)
2 years ago
Carlo, true, the ads don't show up in the feed (although with Feedburner I think you can get this to happen) but that's no big deal I think for most of us since that's not the primary reason why I'm blogging.
I am thinking helping people read stuff is the primary goal - driving traffic to the site is great but not the number one priority. And I don't want to inadvertently drive readers away by not being open with the content.
Thanks for visiting and commenting!
2 years ago
I had to give up on Nicholas Carr's roughtype because I found myself saving it until last all the time because of the partial feeds.
2 years ago
For me, a blog has to be really, really good for me to go to the trouble of visiting the site for every article.
You're right, I think it also shows the goodwill of the author...if the blog author knowingly switches to excerpts, that says something about their character.
2 years ago