<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Blogging About Blogs, The Bloggers That Blog Them, And Gaming</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:48 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogging About Blogs, The Bloggers That Blog Them, And Gaming</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/28/blogging-about-blogs-the-bloggers-that-blog-them-and-gaming/#comment-1749982</link><description>Humility is a hard target sure, but still worth striving for...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've definitely had to realize what you point out - I got a comment about a &lt;a href="http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/07/how-youtube-is-already-inflating-web-20/" rel="nofollow"&gt;post I did on a web 2.0 site&lt;/a&gt; from a founder pointing out factual errors I made - which I fixed, but it was still a reality check. I think I was getting lulled into a sense of posting in a bubble because of lack of comments. It's an easy assumption for the beginning blogger.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Luckilly I don't see myself as prone to rants, tirades, or anger - mostly just annoyance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:32:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging About Blogs, The Bloggers That Blog Them, And Gaming</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/28/blogging-about-blogs-the-bloggers-that-blog-them-and-gaming/#comment-1749983</link><description>Humility is always a hard target for blogging though because blogging by nature is an egotistical activity. What I found help me was when I realized that if you write crap about someone they'll usually end up reading it[1]... it isn't a soapbox into nothingness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I try to at least make good points if I'm going to rant into something...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[1] If only because they're searching what people are saying about them / their product.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:58:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging About Blogs, The Bloggers That Blog Them, And Gaming</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/28/blogging-about-blogs-the-bloggers-that-blog-them-and-gaming/#comment-1749981</link><description>That's a good point. If someone complains about a situation but uses themselves as the sole example it's easy to call it sour grapes. I give Scoble the benefit of the doubt because I read his blog, but I can see why others might not see it that way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Humility is a good stance to blog from. Maybe another one of those unwritten rules of blogging.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:56:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging About Blogs, The Bloggers That Blog Them, And Gaming</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2007/01/28/blogging-about-blogs-the-bloggers-that-blog-them-and-gaming/#comment-1749980</link><description>I think most people have been in Robert's shoes before... this argument would have been much better served if he'd used an example OTHER than himself.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know I've seen a story on TechCrunch/Scoble before where I was thinking "I covered that a month ago!" and wishing I'd gotten a juicy link. But all you have to do to restore humility is do a little digging and find the guys who had the scoop a month before you did, and realize that you're being hypocritical because you didn't go through the extra effort to find previous links either.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">engtech</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 17:56:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>