<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Webomatica - Latest Comments in Adobe&amp;#8217;s Boring Icons</title><link>http://webomatica.disqus.com/</link><description>Entertainment and Tech Digest</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:44:13 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Adobe&amp;#8217;s Boring Icons</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/21/adobes-boring-icons/#comment-1749239</link><description>Well... from what I can gather they have some usability argument. I'm totally fine with colors... just gimme a square with rounded corners and some pretty image to look at... especially if it's going to be in my dock all day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Webomatica</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:44:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adobe&amp;#8217;s Boring Icons</title><link>http://www.webomatica.com/wordpress/2006/12/21/adobes-boring-icons/#comment-1749238</link><description>Yeah, I went over and looked at the "periodic" wheel image you linked to. Talk about confusing. I'd have preferred if a class of apps all shared the same color and had more literal icons. My dock right now has a camera for PS Elements and that seems very intuitive to me. Speaking of which, how will they differentiate between full versions of Photoshop (Ps) and all the lite ones? Pse? That seems pretty lame.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:34:45 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>